English | Русский
logo

Туберкулез (ТБ) - Профилактика

Искать
Искать в

Вопросы

В обработке

Номер Вопрос Тема Ответ
1975 Russian Аутрич - работник из ОГПР Ответ пока отсутствует
1956 English Russian наркомания Ответ пока отсутствует
1923 English Russian профилактика Ответ пока отсутствует
1932 English Russian профилактика Ответ пока отсутствует
1971 Russian Статистика по Трудовой миграции в РТ Ответ пока отсутствует

Общее количество 6 ( Далее )

Ответ предоставлен

Номер Вопрос Тема Ответ
324 English Russian Эффективность терапии English Russian
1363 English Russian Эффективность ревакцинации против туберкулеза English Russian
1473 English Russian Эффективная профилактика передозировки English Russian
674 English Russian Что такое туберкулез? English Russian
707 English Russian хочу больше знат новое тестирование English Russian

Общее количество 190 ( Далее )

Публикации

Обращение Авторы Публикация Страница(ы) Ссылка / Файл
Беляева ВВ Беляева ВВ 51-54
English : Ссылка
руководство по консультированию ВИЧ-инфицированных
Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in Resource-Limited Settings AIDS Education & Training Centers National Resource Center
English : Ссылка
Table: Mean BCG scar size during the first 6 months in infants from a hyperendemic area for tuberculosis in Lima, Peru, vaccinated during the first month of life English : Скачать
English : Ссылка
Scar size and effectiveness of Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination in the prevention of tuberculosis and leprosy: a case-control study. Zodpey SP, Shrikhande SN, Kulkarni SW, Maldhure BR. Indian J Public Health 184-9
English : Ссылка
BACKGROUND: The study was undertaken to estimate the effectiveness of BCG vaccination in relation to scar size in the prevention of tuberculosis and leprosy. METHODS: The present study was designed as hospital-based pair-matched case-control study and was carried out at Government Medical College Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. It included 877 cases of tuberculosis and 292 cases of leprosy (diagnosed by WHO criteria), born onwards 1962. Each case was pair-matched with one control for age, sex and socio-economic status. BCG vaccination status was assessed by examination for the presence of BCG scar, immunisation records if available and information from subjects/parents of children. Subjects uncertain about BCG vaccination were not included. The diameter of the BCG scar was measured both across and along the arm in millimeters using a plastic ruler. The average was then calculated. RESULTS: A significant protective association between BCG vaccination and tuberculosis (OR=0.38, 95% CI 0.31-0.47) and leprosy (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.55) was observed. The overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 62% (95% CI 53-69) against tuberculosis and 62% (95% CI 45- against leprosy. Vaccine effectiveness against tuberculosis and leprosy was non-significantly greater in the group who had BCG scar size < or =5 mm as compared to subjects who had BCG scar size > 5 mm. Thus there was no clear association between BCG scar size and its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The current study did not identify any significant association between BCG scar size and its effectiveness against tuberculosis or leprosy
BCG scars in northern Malawi: sensitivity and repeatability of scar reading, and factors affecting scar size. Floyd S, Ponnighaus JM, Bliss L, Warndorff DK, Kasunga A, Mogha P, Fine PE. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Dec;4(12):1133-42. 1133-42 English : Скачать
English : Ссылка
SETTING: Karonga district, northern Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and repeatability of BCG scar reading, and factors affecting scar size. DESIGN: Follow-up of individuals aged > 3 months who were recruited into a BCG vaccine trial (1986-1989), and of infants vaccinated in health centres (1989-1991), who were examined for presence and size of BCG scars in subsequent years. All examinations were carried out blind of information on true vaccination status or the results of previous examinations. RESULTS: For trial individuals who were considered scar negative at recruitment and received BCG, the sensitivity of scar reading was > or = 93%, repeatability was > or = 94% for those < 60 years old at vaccination, and only around 1% were assessed as having > 1 BCG scar post-vaccination. For infants vaccinated when < 1 month old in health centres, the proportion who still had recognisable scars 4 years later was < 80%. Scars were larger in individuals with a prior BCG vaccination, and for those aged 15-59 at vaccination the scars were approximately 1 mm larger for males than for females. CONCLUSIONS: A BCG scar is a highly sensitive and repeatable indicator of vaccination status when the vaccine is properly handled, delivered appropriately, and given at over 3 months of age, but not for vaccinations given within 1 month of birth. Given that most vaccinations in the world are given soon after birth, this low sensitivity will lead to both vaccine coverage and vaccine efficacy being underestimated in studies in which vaccination status is inferred from the presence/absence of a distinctive BCG scar. Age-sex patterns identified for scar size show important similarities to those found with skin test responses to tuberculin.

Общее количество 6 ( Далее )